|Looks mostly finished, although it's been this way for a while.|
What if we use the golf courses and steeper slopes of the valley as our "wildlife corridor?" The Biosphere Institute lacked the resources and the motivation to go after the developers, and instead turned against those with less clout and less money: the trail users. Rogue bike trails on slopes steeper than those preferred for wildlife were closed down. Off trail access and trail construction was now severely limited in these areas with stories of offenders being led out of the woods by Conservation Officers at gunpoint!
Recently, there was a story that was in the Rocky Mountain Outlook (and CBC) about how wildlife cameras in wildlife corridors around Canmore photographed much more trail users and off leash dogs (and their idiotic owners) than wildlife. While one conclusion could be that trail users have driven away the wildlife from the corridors, one could surely question the suitability of these corridors in the first place. Is the terrain in these designated wildlife corridors too steep for the wildlife.
And while progress on the golf course has stalled, they are talking about using the land, land that was supposed to be both a golf course and wildlife corridor, for even more development!
I would argue that development and not trail use has the biggest impact on wildlife movement in the Bow Valley. Groups like the Biosphere Institute and Yellowstone to Yukon instead turn on trail users because like any bully, they are too scared to take on something bigger. Biosphere Institute and Yellowstone to Yukon both have offices and staff taking up developed space in Canmore, adding to the pressure for more development. Maybe it's time they set an example and leave the valley and promote other places to live and recreate that will have less impact on the wildlife?