Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Protect our Wildlife Corridors...by not living in them!

You may have noticed that in my "Not List" on the right side of the page, I have "golf courses that go bankrupt AFTER clearing all of the trees". I am referring to a golf course at Three Sisters in Canmore, a second course in the Three Sisters/Stewart Creek area. Land that was once pristine, is now scarred and sits in a land use purgatory.

 

Looks mostly finished, although it's been this way for a while.
Canmore has seen tremendous growth and development since the 1988 Olympics as people move there to enjoy the scenery and activities available in the mountains. Being close enough to Calgary that it is essentially a suburb (lots of people commute the 1hr+ each way) and with the services of a major city close by, it is a gateway drug for both vacation home ownership and mountain life. In the late 90's/early 2000's, the Biosphere Institute, a Canmore based biological society decided that enough was enough and decided that it was time to get Alberta Parks or SRD to designate some areas off limits to development as wildlife corridors and habitat patches. Unfortunately, by this point, the cat was well out of the bag and much of the low angle terrain that animals love to travel through was snapped up for development.

What if we use the golf courses and steeper slopes of the valley as our "wildlife corridor?" The Biosphere Institute lacked the resources and the motivation to go after the developers, and instead turned against those with less clout and less money: the trail users. Rogue bike trails on slopes steeper than those preferred for wildlife were closed down. Off trail access and trail construction was now severely limited in these areas with stories of offenders being led out of the woods by Conservation Officers at gunpoint!

Recently, there was a story that was in the Rocky Mountain Outlook (and CBC) about how wildlife cameras in wildlife corridors around Canmore photographed much more trail users and off leash dogs (and their idiotic owners) than wildlife. While one conclusion could be that trail users have driven away the wildlife from the corridors, one could surely question the suitability of these corridors in the first place. Is the terrain in these designated wildlife corridors too steep for the wildlife.

And while progress on the golf course has stalled, they are talking about using the land, land that was supposed to be both a golf course and wildlife corridor, for even more development!

I would argue that development and not trail use has the biggest impact on wildlife movement in the Bow Valley. Groups like the Biosphere Institute and Yellowstone to Yukon instead turn on trail users because like any bully, they are too scared to take on something bigger. Biosphere Institute and Yellowstone to Yukon both have offices and staff taking up developed space in Canmore, adding to the pressure for more development. Maybe it's time they set an example and leave the valley and promote other places to live and recreate that will have less impact on the wildlife?

2 comments:

  1. Who hurt you? It seems someone must have hurt you deeply to make you act like this, so senselessly mean. I don't even know how I got here to this blog, but we must have common friends because I have noticed you being really rude and awful to people on Facebook, too. Hope you can find happiness somehow, man. Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for letting me get this off my chest. I'll never be able to afford to live in Canmore, but that's ok, my family has a 2nd home there. I'm sorry I called SkierBob a "kook", it's just that as a vulnerable road user (a cyclist) and someone who has taken high school physics, I know that stopping distance increases parabolically with speed and that excessive speeding (20km/hr over) puts my life at risk. Should masters racers be subsidized by casino funding that is supposed to be used for youth programs? Does that cover things?

    ReplyDelete